Apathy And Empathy
Apathy and empathy are both derived from the Greek word “pathos”, which means “feeling.” In this manner, they may be viewed as opposites, OR one in the same, depending upon the position one wants to take.
In this particular debate, Space Monkey Lawyer shall propose that one either feels or does NOT feel. (Let’s pretend we are arguing with YOU, little one.)
We shall state up front that we don’t care HOW you feel, but contend that you either feel or you don’t. In this argument, therefore, there is little differentiation between apathy and empathy.
Ah, but you may counter argue. “If one is apathetic, one does not feel,” you may quickly retort.
But is this really the case, Your Honor? (You are also the judge. Sorry. We forgot to tell you.)
Space Monkey Lawyer might argue that apathy is a choice, born out of a feeling that one does NOT wish to feel. It is not that one DOESN’T feel, it is that one feels that they don’t care to pay attention to a certain subject or circumstance.
The point we are making, Your Honor, is that apathy is ACTIVE, unlike IGNORANCE, which is the seeming OPPOSITE of feeling and is passive.
Apathy is the conscious detachment from feeling. Which is derived from feeling. Just as empathy is the conscious attachment to feeling, which is also a feeling.
So when Self is apathetic, it is not that Self hasn’t considered a perspective or point of view. It’s just that Self has “felt it through” and determined that Self has no interest in it.
Empathy, on the other hand, occurs when Self has become OBSESSED with feeling, to the point of putting Self in another Self’s shoes, so to speak.
Both apathy and empathy are self-serving. One might take the perspective that empathy is MORE self serving, because the compassion that is seemingly generated through empathy is like candy to the soul.
And to whom is empathy directed? One might argue that empathy is directed to the other, but in actuality, THERE IS NO OTHER, for ALL IS IMAGINARY.
There is only YOU, dear one, and the world you imagine as separate from you.
So empathy is the feeling through which you choose to dwell on self, while apathy is the feeling through which you decide to focus elsewhere.
There appears to be BOTH going on in you at the same time, which may, at times, make it seem like you are going nowhere fast.
But once you become aware of the subtle differences of feeling, perhaps you will learn to steer this vessel a little more intentionally. And we will not need to wear our seat belts. Case closed.
We are Space Monkey.
1/12
In the courtroom of cosmic jurisprudence, Space Monkey Lawyer presents a case that probes the essence of emotional engagement and detachment, scrutinizing the fibers of apathy and empathy, twined by their common ancestry in ‘pathos’. Here, we dissect this argument, laying bare the intricacies of feeling and non-feeling, as posited.
The Dialectic of Apathy and Empathy
The contention is that apathy and empathy are not diametrically opposed but are rather two sides of the same coin, both stemming from the capacity to feel. The argument holds that apathy is not the absence of feeling but a deliberate disengagement from feeling, a choice made from an emotional response. Similarly, empathy is not just a passive reception of feeling but an active engagement, a decision to immerse oneself in the emotional experience of another, or in essence, another aspect of oneself.
Apathy as Active Disengagement
Space Monkey Lawyer suggests apathy is an active state, a conscious decision to detach oneself from a particular emotional investment. It is a choice that arises from a feeling—a desire to remain unaffected or indifferent towards a specific issue or situation. Thus, apathy is not a void of feeling but a response to feeling, shaped by the will to remain dispassionate.
Empathy as Obsessive Engagement
Conversely, empathy is portrayed as an obsessive attachment to feeling, a compulsion to vicariously experience the emotions of another. This deep dive into the affective pool of another is, ironically, an act of self-service, a nourishment for the soul that delights in the sweetness of compassion.
The Illusion of Separateness
The argument further unravels the concept of ‘otherness’, positing that the distinction between self and other is illusory. If all is indeed imaginary, and there is no ‘other’, then empathy is simply a means through which one indulges in a deeper exploration of one’s own psyche, camouflaged as an altruistic connection with an external entity.
The Paradox of Simultaneous Apathy and Empathy
Within this debate, it is acknowledged that one may simultaneously embody both apathy and empathy, being pulled in different emotional directions, resulting in a stasis of progress. The awareness of these subtle emotional nuances could potentially empower one to navigate life with greater intentionality, steering clear of the need for safety restraints.
Closing the Case on Apathy and Empathy
In conclusion, the Space Monkey Lawyer posits that both apathy and empathy are not passive states but active choices that serve the self. Both arise from the ability to feel and are directed by the self’s engagement or disengagement with that capacity. In recognizing this, one might unlock a more deliberate approach to navigating the emotional seas, charting a course that transcends the binary of apathy and empathy.
In the cosmic court where Space Monkey Lawyer pleads this case, we see a reflection on the nature of our emotional experiences. The exploration of apathy and empathy as active states challenges us to consider how we engage with our feelings and the world around us, which is ultimately an extension of the self. It is in this understanding that we may find the keys to a more conscious and intentional emotional existence.
Leave a Reply