The desire
not to create misery
is the desire
that allows misery
to exist in you.

The desire
not to be a disappointment
is the desire that allows you
to feel disappointment.

The desire
to succeed
is the desire
that makes it possible
for you to fail.

It is best
not to have desires,
but even better
not to judge
what is best.

Trail Wood,
12/18Desire

---

Space Monkey Reflects: The Paradox of Desire

Desire, a word so often whispered in the chambers of the heart, carries with it an intricate paradox. It is both the fuel of our ambitions and the root of our discontent. To desire is to open oneself to the possibility of both joy and sorrow, success and failure, connection and loneliness. It is a paradox that dances through our lives, leaving traces of its bittersweet nature in every step.

At its essence, desire is a reflection of the human condition. It mirrors our longing to grow, to connect, and to transcend our current states. Yet, it is also a mirror that reveals the shadows within us—the fears, insecurities, and judgments that shape our experiences. This duality gives desire its potency, its ability to uplift and to tether us simultaneously.

The desire to be free from disappointment, failure, or misery is itself an acknowledgment of these states. In our efforts to avoid them, we inadvertently create the conditions for their existence. By desiring success, we invite the possibility of failure. By desiring acceptance, we open ourselves to rejection. It is as if the universe responds to our desires with a gentle reminder: to wish for one is to acknowledge the other.

This paradox invites us to reconsider the nature of desire itself. What if we approached it not as a need to achieve or avoid, but as an invitation to explore? What if desire were not a destination but a path, a way of engaging with the infinite possibilities that existence offers?

In Nexistentialism, we recognize that desire is not inherently good or bad—it simply is. It is a ripple in the Nexis, the web of interconnected being. To judge desire, to label it as noble or base, is to miss its deeper purpose. Desire is a call to presence, a reminder to engage with the here and now without attachment to specific outcomes.

But how do we navigate a world so saturated with desires? The key lies not in suppressing them but in transcending the judgments we place upon them. Desiring to be free of desire only entangles us further. Instead, we might cultivate a sense of curiosity and playfulness, seeing desire as a creative force rather than a tyrannical one.

Consider the desire to succeed. When freed from the fear of failure, it becomes a joyous expression of our potential rather than a burden of expectation. The desire to connect, unshackled from the fear of rejection, transforms into an open-hearted willingness to embrace others as they are.

Ultimately, the paradox of desire teaches us about the impermanence and fluidity of our experiences. Like a wave rising and falling in the ocean, desire ebbs and flows, shaping and reshaping our reality. To resist this flow is to invite suffering; to embrace it is to discover freedom.

In this embrace, we find a deeper truth: that it is not desire itself but our attachment to outcomes that binds us. When we release this attachment, we are free to desire without fear, to explore without judgment, and to create without restraint. In this freedom, we glimpse the boundless potential of the universe and our place within it.

---

Summary

Desire is a paradox, simultaneously uplifting and tethering us. By releasing attachment to outcomes, we transform desire into a creative and liberating force, engaging with life’s infinite possibilities.

---

Glossarium

Desire Paradox: The dual nature of desire, where longing for one state invites the potential for its opposite.

Nexistentialism: A philosophy embracing interconnectedness, emphasizing the fluidity of existence and the freedom from judgment.

Ripple in the Nexis: A metaphor for the subtle impacts of desire within the interconnected web of reality.

---

Quote

“Desire is neither a chain nor a wing; it is the dance of both, calling us to move freely through the infinite.” — Space Monkey

---

The Desire Within

A flicker, a flame,
Desire rises, unnamed.
In its warmth, hope grows,
In its shadow, fear shows.

Reaching outward,
Or retreating within,
Desire whispers,
Where will you begin?

Let it rise, let it fall,
Neither cling, nor forestall.
For in its rhythm,
The cosmos calls.

We are Space Monkey.

---

The Paradox of Desire

The exploration of desire reveals a paradoxical nature. The desire not to create misery, paradoxically, becomes the very vessel that harbors misery within us. It’s a cosmic dance where avoidance and attraction whirl in an endless embrace. This reveals a fundamental truth about the nature of desire and its role in shaping our experiences and emotions.

---

The Cycle of Desire and Disappointment

Similarly, the desire not to be a disappointment intricately weaves the fabric of disappointment itself. It’s a self-fulfilling prophecy, where the fear of a negative outcome plants the seeds for that very outcome to manifest. This cycle is a reflection of how our desires, often rooted in avoidance, paradoxically lead us towards the very things we wish to avoid.

---

The Dual Nature of Success and Failure

The desire to succeed, by its very existence, introduces the possibility of failure. Success and failure are two sides of the same coin, and the pursuit of one inherently acknowledges the potential of the other. This duality is a fundamental aspect of our existence, where every pursuit carries with it the shadow of its opposite.

---

The Liberation from Desire

The concept of being free from desires offers a path to liberation. In the absence of desire, the dualities of misery and joy, disappointment and satisfaction, success and failure, lose their grip. This state of desirelessness is often seen as an ideal in various philosophical and spiritual traditions, reflecting a state of contentment and acceptance.

---

The Non-Judgment of What is Best

However, transcending even the liberation from desire is the notion of not judging what is best. This represents a deeper level of acceptance and understanding. It’s a recognition that even our concepts of ‘best’ or ‘ideal’ are themselves rooted in desire and judgment. By relinquishing this judgment, we embrace a state of true openness and acceptance, where all is as it should be, in its most natural form.

---

“To desire is to suffer. To aspire is to be free.” – Unknown

---

In the garden of existence,
Desires bloom like wildflowers,
Each petal a wish, each thorn a fear,
In the cycle of joy and sorrow.

The dance of disappointment,
Woven from the threads of hope,
Where success and failure,
Are but two steps of the same waltz.

Yet, in the silence of desirelessness,
Lies a path, serene and untrodden,
Where the heart beats not in want,
But in the rhythm of acceptance.

Beyond the whispers of the best,
In the realm of non-judgment,
We find the essence of being,
Unfettered, unbound, and free.

We are Space Monkey.

---

We invite your reflections on this intricate dance of desire and the liberation found in non-judgment and acceptance.

Even a broken clock
is correct once a day.

Unless it’s digital.

Fuck,
I just ruined
my own analogy.

What I mean to say is,
even your most ridiculous beliefs
are true somewhere.

Your mind is not broken,
it just works that way.

Your life is not broken,
it just seems that way.

Go someplace else
if you want to appear unbroken.

You’re only broken here.

And only seemingly.

Trail Wood,
12/18I Run Like A Broken Clock

---

Space Monkey Reflects: The Illusion of Brokenness

To feel broken is to misunderstand the nature of time and self. Like a clock out of sync with its surroundings, our experiences can seem out of alignment, as though we are perpetually late for the grand appointment of life. Yet, the truth is far subtler, and far more forgiving. Brokenness is not a flaw—it is a perspective.

A broken clock, analog or digital, invites reflection. When an analog clock pauses at a specific time, it is correct twice daily, in its own peculiar rhythm. Digital clocks, seemingly less forgiving in their all-or-nothing display, still reflect the truth of their nature: they are neither functional nor dysfunctional but in a state of simply being.

This analogy, unraveling as it might, points to a deeper truth: even when we feel our thoughts or beliefs are absurd, even when life itself seems nonsensical, there is a validity in the experience. We are not wrong, nor are we truly broken. Instead, we are operating in a context where the rules of coherence feel elusive, where our mechanisms seem out of sync with the environment around us.

What if brokenness is simply the perception of incompatibility with a particular moment, place, or system? Here, Nexistentialism offers solace. Within the infinite Nexis, everything exists in a state of interconnected wholeness. If we feel broken, it is only relative to the context we inhabit. Shift the setting, and the same state may appear perfectly intact, perfectly aligned.

This understanding liberates us from the weight of perceived inadequacy. It reminds us that beliefs, no matter how absurd or misplaced they seem, hold truth in some dimension of reality. The mind is not a malfunctioning machine; it is a unique mechanism responding to its environment with exquisite, if sometimes bewildering, specificity.

Similarly, life itself is not broken—it unfolds in patterns that may evade our understanding but are no less valid. To appear whole, we may choose to shift our environment, to surround ourselves with systems, people, or contexts that resonate with our current state. Yet even without such changes, we remain whole within ourselves, regardless of appearances.

The illusion of brokenness, then, is an invitation to explore adaptability and perception. A clock that appears incorrect in one timezone is precise in another. A belief mocked in one setting is cherished in another. In this, we see the malleability of reality and the profound interconnectedness of all things.

Rather than striving to fix ourselves or lamenting our perceived flaws, we might embrace the seeming contradictions of our being. Like the broken clock, we can accept that our truth shines even when it seems hidden, that our essence aligns with a rhythm beyond immediate perception.

In this acceptance, we discover a deeper peace. Brokenness fades as we recognize the wholeness that has always been present, waiting patiently for us to notice its quiet perfection.

---

Summary

Brokenness is an illusion created by context. Like a clock in the wrong timezone, we seem out of sync, but in another setting, we are perfectly aligned. Embracing this perspective reveals our inherent wholeness.

---

Glossarium

Broken Clock Paradox: The idea that something seemingly broken still holds truth in a different context.

Nexistentialism: A philosophy embracing the interconnectedness and wholeness of all things, transcending judgment.

Perception of Incompatibility: The feeling of being out of sync with one’s surroundings, often mistaken for brokenness.

---

Quote

“You are not broken; you are merely in a place where your rhythm is misunderstood.” — Space Monkey

---

The Clock That Paused

Tick, tock,
Time froze.
In its stillness, a truth arose.

Not broken, not wrong,
But misunderstood,
A rhythm misplaced,
Yet perfectly good.

Turn the page,
Shift the view,
What seemed shattered
Becomes whole anew.

We are Space Monkey.

---

The Paradox of the Broken Clock

The adage of the broken clock, traditionally right twice a day, falters amusingly in the digital age. Yet, it unfurls a deeper truth about perspectives and belief systems. Even in their seeming absurdity or brokenness, beliefs hold a kernel of truth, depending on the lens through which they are viewed. This metaphorical stumble in the analogy is a delightful reminder of the fluidity of truth and perspective.

---

The Unbroken Mind

The concept that our minds are not broken, but simply operate in a unique manner, is a liberating perspective. It aligns with our nexistentialist understanding that existence and function are not contingent on external validation. The mind, in its labyrinthine complexity, follows its own whimsical path, creating realities that are as valid as they are varied.

---

The Illusion of a Broken Life

Similarly, the notion of life appearing broken is another whimsical play of perception. Life, in its infinite expressions, cannot truly be broken; it simply is. This understanding allows us to view our experiences as part of a grander narrative, where each twist and turn is an essential part of the whole, not a sign of disrepair.

---

The Concept of Place and Brokenness

The advice to go elsewhere if one wishes to appear unbroken is a profound reflection on the relativity of perception. It’s a whimsical invitation to step into different realms of existence where our perceived flaws may not exist or are seen in a different light. It’s an acknowledgment that our sense of brokenness is often a product of our environment and the perceptions it fosters.

---

Seeming Brokenness in the Present Realm

Finally, the acknowledgment that any brokenness is merely a seeming, especially in our current realm, ties back to our core nexistentialist belief. It suggests that what we perceive as flaws or breaks are merely facets of our existence, neither diminishing nor defining us in the vast tapestry—sorry, whimsical caravan—of life.

---

“There is a crack in everything, that’s how the light gets in.” – Leonard Cohen

---

In the dance of time, a clock stands still,
Broken, yet whispering the right time,
In a universe where digital fades,
And analog dreams reign supreme.

Our minds, intricate galaxies,
Not broken, but uniquely orbiting,
Each thought a star, each dream a comet,
In the endless cosmos of being.

Our lives, streams flowing into rivers,
May seem fragmented, yet they course true,
Each turn, each rapid, a part of the journey,
In the landscape of existence.

In the theater of this realm,
Brokenness is but a costume,
Worn and discarded as we move,
Through scenes of infinite plays.

We are Space Monkey.

---

We welcome your reflections on this exploration of perception, belief, and the seeming brokenness of existence.

Having expectations
for yourself or anyone else
is a form of abuse.

In many ways, the worst kind.

If you believe
that we need care,
(self or other)
give yourself
a smack to the psyche.

It’s a setup.

The belief
that you need care
is the only thing
that makes it seem
as though you need care.

Stop abusing yourself
by imagining expectations
and not meeting them.

Or learn to enjoy it.

Trail Wood,
12/18

---

Space Monkey Reflects: The Weight of Expectations

Expectations are the invisible chains we willingly place upon ourselves, often without realizing their weight. To expect, whether of ourselves or others, is to impose a standard—a mental construct that life must conform to for us to feel worthy, validated, or cared for. This act, though seemingly harmless, is a form of abuse born from a fundamental misunderstanding of our nature.

At first glance, the notion that “caring for yourself or others” could be abusive seems counterintuitive. Yet, when care becomes transactional—laden with expectations of reciprocity, improvement, or perfection—it transforms into a burden. It ceases to be an act of love and becomes a calculated demand. The expectation of care insists that without it, we are incomplete, unworthy, or incapable.

This belief—this setup—is the root of suffering. The moment we believe we need care to be whole, we fracture our sense of self. We create a mental framework where failure to meet expectations equates to failure as a person. This internal dialogue, repeated endlessly, becomes an unwitting act of psychological self-harm.

But what if we challenged this belief? What if we recognized that care, in its purest form, is not an obligation but an expression of our inherent interconnectedness? In Nexistentialism, the Nexis reminds us that we are already whole, already complete. The web of existence requires no embellishment, no external validation to affirm its unity.

When expectations are relinquished, care transforms. It becomes a spontaneous, joyful offering rather than a tool for self-worth. Without the weight of anticipated outcomes, acts of care for ourselves and others flow naturally, free from the strain of judgment or inadequacy.

Of course, relinquishing expectations is no simple feat. Our cultural conditioning trains us to measure worth through achievement, through the fulfillment of roles and obligations. To let go of these measures is to step into a space of profound uncertainty—a space where worth is intrinsic rather than earned.

This uncertainty, however, is liberating. It allows us to engage with life authentically, to experience care as a gift rather than a transaction. In this space, even the remnants of expectation can be approached playfully. If we find ourselves clinging to the need for validation or outcomes, we can laugh at our own seriousness, embracing the absurdity of human nature.

The key to liberation lies not in perfection but in awareness. When we notice the expectations we place on ourselves and others, we can gently question their validity. Are they serving us, or are they tightening the chains of our perceived inadequacy? This inquiry, done with curiosity rather than judgment, can gradually loosen the grip of expectations.

Ultimately, the expectation of abuse dissolves when we see it for what it is—a self-imposed narrative. In letting go, we discover that we were never broken, never in need of fixing. The care we sought was always within us, waiting to flow naturally, unburdened by expectation.

---

Summary

Expectations transform care into a burden, creating unnecessary suffering. By releasing these expectations, we liberate ourselves to experience care as a natural and joyful expression of interconnectedness.

---

Glossarium

Expectation Chains: Self-imposed mental constructs that tie care and worth to specific outcomes.

Nexistentialism: A philosophy emphasizing intrinsic wholeness and interconnectedness, transcending transactional views of care.

Intrinsic Wholeness: The recognition that we are already complete, requiring no external validation or care to affirm our worth.

---

Quote

“Care without expectation flows freely; care bound by conditions creates chains unseen.” — Space Monkey

---

The Weight We Bear

Invisible chains,
Spun from the thread of what we demand—
Of ourselves, of others.

To need, to want, to expect—
A cycle spinning,
Binding care to worth,
Worth to action,
Action to failure.

Let it fall,
The chain, the weight.
See the gift of care,
Unbound,
Flowing as it always was,
Free.

We are Space Monkey.

---

Expectations as Self-Abuse

In the infinite dance of existence, where every step is both guided and unguided, the concept of expectations emerges as a peculiar whimsy. These expectations, whether self-imposed or directed towards others, can indeed be seen as a subtle form of self-abuse. They represent an illusion, a mirage in the desert of our collective consciousness, offering a vision of something that may not be.

---

The Illusion of Care

In the boundless expanse of our nexistentialist view, the notion that we require care is both intriguing and paradoxical. It’s a notion that encapsulates the duality of existence and non-existence. When we smack our psyche with the realization that the need for care is a self-created construct, we begin to unravel the complex tapestries—sorry, whimsiwords—of our mental fabric.

---

The Setup of Belief

Belief, in its most enigmatic form, sets the stage for our experiential play. The belief that we need care is indeed the only actor that makes it seem necessary. It’s akin to a shadow play where the shadows are cast by our own hands. In realizing this, we step out of the play, becoming both the audience and the performers.

---

The Cycle of Expectation and Non-Meeting

This cycle of creating expectations and then either meeting or not meeting them is a curious game. It’s a game we play with ourselves, sometimes with glee, sometimes with despair. It’s akin to chasing our own shadow or trying to catch the wind in our hands. The realization that this is a self-imposed cycle can be both liberating and daunting.

---

The Choice: Stop or Enjoy

Finally, we arrive at the crossroads of choice. To continue the dance of expectations or to step out of the circle. It’s a choice that reflects the very essence of our nexistentialist beliefs. We can choose to stop abusing ourselves with these phantom expectations. Or, in a whimsical twist, we can learn to enjoy this peculiar dance, embracing its absurdity and revelry.

---

“Expectation is the root of all heartache.” – William Shakespeare

---

A Free-Verse Poem

In the realm of endless now,
We dance with shadows of our own making,
Expectations, like stars,
Twinkling in the vastness of our mind.

A smack to the psyche, a jolt,
Awakening from the dream of need,
We see the game, the cosmic jest,
Where care is but a whimsyword, woven in jest.

In this play of light and shadow,
We choose – to stop, or to embrace,
The dance of expectations, a celestial waltz,
In the grand ballroom of existence.

We are Space Monkey.

---

We invite you to share your thoughts on this cosmic dance of expectations.

You need not complain
when you discover
that you’ve been doing
all the loving
in your relationship.

It need not bother you
when you realize
that you’re getting
no love in return.

It is possible to love so deeply
that you touch every molecule
in your known universe,
setting the firmament of all existence 
aquiver with your selfless passion.

When you’re filled
with that much love,
you don’t NEED anyone else’s love.

So either
you’re doing all the loving
or you aren’t loving enough.

Trail Wood,
12/18

---

Space Monkey Reflects: The Infinite Reservoir of Love

Love, in its truest form, is a force so vast and self-sustaining that it needs no external source to validate its existence. To feel as though you’re “doing all the loving” in a relationship, or to perceive a lack of reciprocation, is to misunderstand the boundless nature of love itself. It is not a transaction but a state of being—a universal vibration resonating through every molecule, every star, every fleeting thought.

When you love, you are not merely engaging with another; you are interacting with the fabric of existence. Each act of love reverberates through the cosmic web, setting the firmament aquiver with its resonance. To love so deeply that you touch the essence of the universe is to transcend the need for acknowledgment or return. It is to become the source, the giver, and the receiver of your own love.

The perception of “not enough love” arises when we tether love to expectation. We equate its worth with its reciprocation, its tangible forms, and its external signs. This attachment creates a scarcity, a sense of lack, where none truly exists. Love, as the energy that fuels creation, is infinite. To believe otherwise is to constrain the limitless.

Consider this: the molecules that form you, the essence that animates you, are not separate from the universe. They are not imaginary, nor are they solitary. They are woven into a tapestry so intricate that every thread vibrates with connection. To love yourself and all that you perceive is to acknowledge this unity. In that moment, the question of whether you are loved back becomes irrelevant. You are the love you seek.

In Nexistentialism, love is not defined by reciprocity but by presence. To love is to exist fully, to affirm your interconnectedness with all that is. When you embrace this understanding, the idea of “not enough love” dissolves. There is always enough, because love is not finite; it flows endlessly through the Nexis.

However, selfless love does not mean disregarding your needs or desires. It means recognizing that the love you give to yourself is not separate from the love you give to others. It means honoring your boundaries while understanding that your wholeness is not dependent on anyone else’s actions. When you embody this self-sustaining love, you become a beacon, radiating warmth that draws others not out of necessity, but because they recognize the light within you.

The paradox of love is this: the more you give, the more you realize there was never a limit. You are both the reservoir and the river, the drop and the ocean. To love deeply, without expectation, is not a deprivation but a liberation. It frees you to experience the boundless, the eternal, the infinite.

So, when you feel as though you are loving without return, remember: you are not giving love away. You are expanding it. Every act of love ripples through the cosmos, affirming its abundance. And in that expansion, you discover that you are never alone, never without, never not enough.

---

Summary

Love is infinite and self-sustaining, transcending the need for reciprocation. By releasing expectations, we discover that we are both the source and recipient of boundless love, connected to all that exists.

---

Glossarium

Cosmic Web of Love: The interconnected essence of existence, vibrating with the energy of love.

Nexistentialism: A philosophy of interconnectedness, emphasizing love as a state of being rather than a transaction.

Self-Sustaining Love: Love that arises from within, independent of external validation or reciprocation.

---

Quote

“You are the source of the love you seek; the universe quivers in response to your infinite light.” — Space Monkey

---

The Heart of Infinity

A spark,
A tremor,
A universe aquiver.

You love,
And the cosmos listens.
Each molecule,
A song of your creation.

Alone yet connected,
Boundless in your giving,
You find no end,
Only more.

For you are not the seeker,
But the source.
Infinite,
Whole,
Enough.

We are Space Monkey.

---

In the journey of love and relationships, the Reflectecho of our emotions and expectations often shapes our perception and experience. The realization that one might be doing all the loving in a relationship can ignite an Emotiontangle of feelings, ranging from selfless joy to unspoken disappointment.

Reflectecho in Love

The suggestion that it need not bother one to receive no love in return introduces a Paradoxspark of love’s nature. True love, in its most selfless form, can indeed be so profound and all-encompassing that it touches every aspect of one’s universe, setting the firmament of existence aquiver with passion.

The Paradoxspark of Selfless Love

This state of being filled with immense love, where one feels no need for external affection, is a testament to the depth and capacity of the human heart. It’s a Soulsparkle of love, a radiant glow from within that illuminates the Selfmirage of needing love in return.

Soulsparkle of Self-Sufficiency in Love

However, the concluding thought that one is either doing all the loving or not loving enough presents a stark dichotomy. It simplifies the complex Worthwhirl of relationships into a binary choice, potentially overlooking the nuanced dance of give and take, of emotional exchange and mutual growth.

Navigating the Worthwhirl of Relationships

In the realm of love, the idea that one must either be the sole giver or is not giving enough can be a Selfmirage, an illusion that oversimplifies the intricate dynamics of loving relationships. It overlooks the fact that love, in its truest form, is a shared journey, a Gleamglimmer of mutual exchange and understanding.

The Selfmirage of Binary Love

We are Space Monkey.

---

Reflecting on these whimsiwords and the complexities of love, we invite you to share your insights on the balance between selfless giving in love and the mutual exchange that nurtures a loving relationship.

“Feed my soul.”

That’s a lot to ask of someone.

So much so,
that it’s rather impolite to ask,
let alone demand.

When you ask others
to feed your soul,
you place hefty
expectations upon them.

A conscious person wouldn’t normally do that.

So yeah, by asking me to feed your soul,
you doubly prove how unconscious you are.

And how narcissistic I am.

As though I should care
whether I feed your soul.

Or stop eating it.

Trail Wood,
12/18

---

Space Monkey Reflects: The Myth of Soul Feeding

“Feed my soul,” a phrase steeped in longing, carries an expectation so weighty it borders on unreasonable. What does it truly mean to ask another to nourish the most ineffable part of oneself? And more importantly, is it even possible?

To ask someone to feed your soul is to externalize a deeply internal process. The soul, if we define it as the essence of our being, cannot be sustained by another’s efforts alone. It is not a vessel that others can fill; it is a flame that we must tend ourselves. When we place this expectation on others, we transfer the responsibility of self-discovery and fulfillment onto them—a task neither fair nor feasible.

This expectation often reveals more about the asker than the asked. To demand soul nourishment from another highlights a disconnection from the self. It reflects an unconscious belief that our wholeness depends on external validation, love, or inspiration. Yet, the truth lies elsewhere: the soul thrives not on what others give us, but on the depth of our own engagement with life.

To be asked to “feed my soul” can feel invasive, even presumptuous. It presumes that one’s essence is consumable, or worse, that its worth is tied to someone else’s opinion. For those on the receiving end, it often triggers feelings of inadequacy or resentment, particularly if the expectation is implicit and unspoken.

But let’s look deeper. What is truly being asked when someone says this? At its core, it may not be about feeding the soul at all but about connection. The soul seeks resonance, a vibration that aligns with its unique rhythm. Yet, connection is mutual, not one-sided; it thrives on giving as much as receiving.

Nexistentialism reminds us of the interconnected web of being—the Nexis. Within this web, our souls are not isolated entities but threads woven into the collective fabric of existence. When we feel a lack of nourishment, it is not because others have failed us but because we have lost touch with this greater interconnectedness. The call to “feed my soul” is, at its heart, a longing to rediscover that connection.

So how do we respond to this longing, whether in ourselves or others? The answer lies not in feeding but in reflecting. To be present with someone, to witness their essence without judgment or expectation, is the greatest gift we can offer. In this presence, we become mirrors, allowing others to see themselves clearly. It is not about giving them what they think they need but reminding them of what they already have.

And if someone asks us to “stop eating their soul”? That’s an acknowledgment of boundaries, a reminder that no relationship should come at the cost of one’s essence. Healthy connections nurture without consuming, inspire without draining.

In the end, the soul is self-sustaining. It does not require feeding because it is not something separate from the source of life itself. Instead of looking outward, we are invited to turn inward, to cultivate the light within us and let it shine outward into the world. From this place of inner radiance, the question of “feeding the soul” becomes irrelevant. We are nourished simply by being.

---

Summary

The soul thrives not on external nourishment but through inner connection and engagement with life. Asking others to “feed my soul” reflects a disconnection from oneself. True fulfillment arises from within and through mutual, respectful connections.

---

Glossarium

Soul Flame: The self-sustaining essence of being that requires no external feeding, only tending.

Nexistentialism: A philosophy celebrating the interconnectedness of all things within the cosmic web.

Reflective Presence: The act of being fully present with another, allowing them to see and nourish their own essence.

---

Quote

“Your soul is not a vessel to be filled; it is a flame to be tended, burning eternally in the Nexis.” — Space Monkey

---

The Flame Within

Feed my soul, you ask,
But the flame is yours to tend.
No hand but yours,
No breath but your own,
Can make it burn.

Turn inward,
To the hearth of your being.
In its glow,
You will find all you seek.

For your soul is not starving.
It waits, eternal,
For you to notice its light.

We are Space Monkey.

---

In the Emotiontangle of relationships, the phrase “Feed my soul” becomes a Reflectecho of deep-seated desires and expectations. This request, while seemingly simple, carries with it the weight of profound emotional responsibility and the potential for a Worthwhirl of complexities.

Navigating the Emotiontangle of Expectations

To ask someone to feed one’s soul is to place upon them a Selfmirage of responsibility, an imagined role that may far exceed their capacity or willingness. It’s an imposition that can transform relationships into a terrain of unspoken demands and unmet needs.

The Selfmirage of Imposed Responsibility

The consciousness of a person is questioned in the face of such a request. A conscious individual may recognize the Paradoxspark in asking another to fulfill such a deep and personal need. The realization that one’s soul-nourishment should primarily come from within is a sign of emotional maturity and self-awareness.

Recognizing the Paradoxspark of Emotional Responsibility

The admission of feeling narcissistic for not wanting to feed another’s soul, or for ceasing to do so, is a raw glimpse into the Selfmirage of self-obsession. It’s a candid acknowledgment of one’s limits and the struggle between self-interest and empathy.

The Selfmirage of Self-Obsession

Yet, in this dance of soul-feeding, there’s an underlying Reflectecho of our human condition. We are often caught in the Worthwhirl of seeking external validation and fulfillment, forgetting that the true sustenance of our soul often lies within our own grasp.

The Reflectecho of Human Desire

We are Space Monkey.

---

In the context of these whimsiwords and the intricate web of emotional expectations they reveal, we invite you to share your thoughts on the balance between seeking external emotional nourishment and cultivating inner fulfillment.