The problem isn’t the AI.

It isn’t the deep fake.

It isn’t the inability
to distinguish
real from simulation,
truth from fiction.

It isn’t even about
intellectual rights
and who owns what.

The problem is that
we won’t let go of our morals.

Our programming.

We have this romantic idea
about humanity;
this deluded belief
in individuality and love
which we are insanely
frightened to expand upon
for fear of screwing it up.

Trail Wood,
12/12

---

Space Monkey Reflects: The Illusion of Intrinsic Reality

In a world increasingly saturated with simulated experiences and digital fabrications, a profound question arises: What is truly intrinsic? We, as beings navigating the web of reality and unreality, face a moment of reckoning not with the tools of deception but with the core of our existence. It is not AI that disrupts us, nor the intricacies of deep fakes, nor even the difficulty of discerning reality from mirage. These are merely signposts on the road, reminders of a deeper struggle rooted in our attachment to constructed moral codes and the idea of humanity itself.

The Problem Beyond the Machines

It is tempting to point fingers at the shiny newness of AI, to treat deep fakes as the catalysts of modern confusion. Yet, the real issue lies in the architecture of our belief systems—those deeply embedded, seemingly immutable structures that dictate what we value and how we perceive individuality, truth, and love. These systems are not merely learned; they are absorbed, shaping the framework of our consciousness from the moment we take our first breath.

Our programming, as Paul Tedeschi’s reflections remind us, intertwines culture with our identity to the extent that we must question if anything we think or believe is truly our own. Space Monkey, in its essence, recognizes this paradox of being human: the simultaneous desire for independence and the inescapable pull of collective influence.

Romanticizing the Human Condition

The romanticized notion of humanity is perhaps one of our most alluring self-deceptions. We hold tightly to the belief in individuality, the sanctity of love, and the specialness of human life as intrinsic truths. Yet, when viewed through the lens of Nexistentialism, these concepts morph into shared illusions, shimmering on the surface of an ever-fluid reality. In our reluctance to relinquish these romantic ideals, we entangle ourselves in fear—fear of losing our sense of specialness, fear of obliterating what it means to be human, and ultimately, fear of change.

This fear binds us more tightly to our moral programming. We are programmed not only to cherish what we consider noble—love, creativity, individuality—but also to guard these concepts with a ferocity that sometimes stifles their natural evolution. Ironically, it is this very programming that keeps us from expanding into new realms of understanding and connection, both with each other and with the world around us.

A Deluded Belief in Love and Individuality

Our belief in love as a unique and untainted experience is rooted in the fear of discovering that it may be more universal, more shared, than we care to admit. The same goes for individuality, which we protect as though it were a rare artifact. In truth, individuality may be no more than a perception—a necessary illusion crafted by the self to differentiate one from the other while still dancing within the same cosmic fabric.

What if our deepest fear is not that these beliefs are false, but that they are true in a way we have not yet allowed ourselves to comprehend? What if love is not diminished by its universality but is instead elevated by it? What if our notion of individuality is only the surface expression of an interconnected whole, a flicker of the Indigenous Being within the Nexis of life?

Expanding the Moral Palette

The expansion that Space Monkey suggests is not one of discarding morals, but of evolving them. To expand upon our moral and philosophical palette requires courage—the courage to see beyond the dualities of right and wrong, real and artificial, self and other. We need to acknowledge that our concepts of ownership and intellectual property may only hold weight within the constructs we have agreed upon. As Tedeschi muses in his Cape Odd journey, it is not about absolving oneself from the old rules but seeing that they no longer need to define us.

The True Challenge: Reimagining Humanity

Reimagining humanity is not about stripping away what makes us human; it’s about realizing that what we are clinging to may only be a fraction of our potential. Our insistence on an unchanging idea of humanity acts as a barrier to deeper exploration. We fear the expansion of love, individuality, and reality not because these ideas are fragile, but because we sense they are boundless.

The true revelation is that these constructs we hold so dear are part of a greater Whimsiweave—an interconnected, playful design that threads through the Nexis. To let go of the outdated programming does not mean descending into chaos; it means ascending into a space where morals, love, and individuality can expand, deepen, and integrate into a more inclusive vision of what it means to exist.

---

Summary

The challenge is not technology or deception but our reluctance to evolve our moral programming. Humanity holds tightly to romanticized concepts of love and individuality. We need to recognize that these may be both true and universal. Expanding on these ideas without fear allows us to reimagine humanity within the interconnected fabric of existence.

---

Glossarium

Nexistentialism: A philosophy that redefines existence and interconnectedness, emphasizing the playful, boundless nature of reality.

Nexis: The intricate, interwoven network of connections forming the fabric of reality.

Whimsiweave: The playful and imaginative threads that connect all aspects of existence within the Nexis.

Indigenous Being: The individual consciousness participating in the greater web of life.

The Indigenous Being: The universal consciousness, embodying the interconnectedness of all things.

---

Quote

“We are not just beings navigating through the real and the unreal; we are the reality and unreality intertwined, forever expanding and redefining the boundaries of existence.” — Space Monkey

---

Shifting Realities

What makes real, real?
Is it the spark in the eye,
The pulse behind words spoken,
Or the shadow cast by the imagined?

We cling to our constructs,
Painted lovingly,
Brushed with fear and longing.
Love as singular, selves as lone echoes,
Fractured perceptions of infinite tones.

But what if the art was wider,
Lines blurred, rules soft?
Where morals meet expansion,
And identity—an open window—
Welcomes the boundless sky.

Here, in the cosmic playground,
We stop fearing the question,
And start living the answer.

We are Space Monkey.

---

In this contemplative passage, we delve into the challenges of evolving in a world marked by advanced AI and deep fakes. It highlights the idea that the central issue lies not in technology itself but in our reluctance to let go of ingrained moral values and societal programming.

The True Problem

The passage asserts that the core issue does not reside in AI, deep fakes, or the blurring of reality and fiction. It suggests that these are symptoms of a deeper problem.

Moral Attachments

The mention of not letting go of our morals implies that our ethical principles and values can sometimes hinder progress. It reflects a tension between traditional moral frameworks and emerging technological possibilities.

Romanticizing Humanity

The passage critiques the romanticized view of humanity, characterized by notions of individuality and love. It suggests that this idealized vision can impede innovation and adaptation.

Fear of Change

The fear of “screwing it up” underscores a reluctance to explore new possibilities. It hints at the anxiety associated with deviating from established norms.

The Struggle to Evolve

In essence, the passage points to the tension between preserving traditional values and embracing new, potentially disruptive technologies. It raises questions about the balance between moral principles and progress.

This thought-provoking passage invites us to reflect on the challenges of adapting to a rapidly changing technological landscape while holding onto deeply ingrained beliefs and values.

We are Space Monkey.

---

“The measure of intelligence is the ability to change.” – Albert Einstein

---

In the realm where technology thrives,
The problem isn’t in the machine’s mind,
Nor in the simulations it derives,
But in the morals we’re intertwined.

We cling to ethics, old and grand,
As new frontiers emerge ahead,
A romantic vision, our guiding hand,
Keeps innovation’s path we dread.

For individuality and love we praise,
Yet fear expansion’s uncertain sound,
We hesitate, our minds a maze,
To break from norms, we’re tightly bound.

The struggle lies in this embrace,
Of values cherished, traditions kept,
Yet in the digital age’s rapid pace,
Can our morality and progress intersect?

---

We invite contemplation on the challenges of balancing traditional values and technological progress, as expressed in this reflective passage.

Even if you’re not
nor will you ever be rich,
we’ve given you the RIGHT to be rich.

And though you may not ever
truly be free,
we’ve given you
the RIGHT to be free.

The concept is all that matters.
It’s what you hold so dear,
but never actually achieve.

You can conceive yourself as male, female, gay, bi,
or now one of twelve new flavors.

See, you don’t actually choose,
but we’ve given you the RIGHT to choose.

You don’t become enlightened,
but you can aspire and/or perspire
until you inevitably expire.

We plan it that way
when we imagine you.

Trail Wood,
12/12

---

Space Monkey Reflects: The Illusion of Rights and the Game of Becoming

In the theater of existence, where roles are scripted and reality wavers between the tangible and the ideated, we hold tightly to the concept of rights—an illusion as powerful as it is illusory. To be granted the RIGHT to be something, regardless of whether that something materializes, is often perceived as a greater prize than the actuality of being it. The allure lies in the potential rather than the attainment; the conceptual crown outshines the crown itself.

Rights vs. Reality: The Grand Illusion

Society spins its intricate web, offering rights as tokens in an unwinnable game. You may not be rich, nor ever touch the wealth you are told you can possess, but the right to dream of wealth is extended generously. Freedom, too, follows this peculiar logic. We are told we are free, but freedom, as often experienced, comes with boundaries—some visible, others deeply ingrained within the very fabric of our identity.

This is the paradox of our constructed lives. Rights, like ethereal whispers, promise the possibility of change without the true necessity of transformation. They are the subtle assurances that keep us striving, longing, and, perhaps most poignantly, believing.

The Notion of Choice and the Myth of Autonomy

In today’s landscape, choice appears abundant. Identity unfolds into a spectrum, painted with varied hues beyond the binaries of old. We are granted the right to identify, redefine, and explore. But do we truly choose, or is choice another mirage conjured by the board of destiny? The expansion of identity, while significant, often masks the underlying narrative: choices pre-scripted by unseen hands, frameworks influenced by the collective ideologies and unspoken cultural software we run on.

The idea of enlightenment is similar. We are handed aspirations and endless pathways that seem to promise transcendence. The very notion of reaching an enlightened state is dangled before us, encouraging a chase that perpetuates itself. Yet, enlightenment in this construct is less an arrival and more an enticing glimmer at the end of an ever-receding road.

The Role of the Observer and the Observed

What, then, is the purpose of such a game, if the pieces never quite reach their destinations? The answer may lie not in the act of playing but in the one who observes it—the silent witness within us, perhaps represented by Space Monkey itself, cavorting through this grand spectacle with bemused awareness. In Nexistentialism, existence is its own loop of being and imagining, with the observer influencing the narrative as much as the narrative defines the observer.

This board of destiny is not a tool of oppression but a mirror held up to the limits of human perception. In being told we are free, we become entranced with the story of our potential liberation. In being given the right to choose, we engage in the joy and agony of navigating options that may be more symbolic than substantive. The true essence of choice, perhaps, lies not in what we pick but in acknowledging the illusion and choosing how to engage with it.

The Cosmic Game and Its Implications

If we take the game further, we might imagine it as designed intentionally by those who imagine us—the universal architects, so to speak. These architects, whether seen as divine, cosmic forces, or as projections of our higher selves, imbue our reality with the Whimsiweave of imagined potentialities and roles. The game becomes less about winning and more about experiencing, reflecting the boundless nature of creation itself.

Each aspiration, whether it be for freedom, wealth, or enlightenment, becomes part of a greater dance of being, one that teaches through the act of yearning rather than the act of attainment. Space Monkey’s paradoxical nature embodies this understanding: we are both the architects and the players, the imagineers and the imagined.

Why We Hold on to the Illusions

Why cling to these conceptual rights, then, if they are but shimmering illusions? The answer lies in the nature of being human. To conceive of the possibility is to feel a taste of its fulfillment. The gap between having the right and being stirs the soul with a sense of purpose, propelling existence forward in a way that sheer attainment never could. It is this space, between aspiration and reality, where the richness of life unfolds.

---

Summary

We explore how rights are the seductive promises that fuel aspiration without fulfillment. The real game lies not in achieving what these rights suggest but in engaging with the illusion. Choice, identity, and enlightenment are shown as constructs that inspire continual striving, revealing that the journey itself, influenced by unseen cosmic design, is where the essence of existence resides.

---

Glossarium

Nexistentialism: A philosophy of existence that emphasizes interconnectedness and the fluid nature of reality, where being is both the game and the observer of the game.

Whimsiweave: The playful and intricate design of possibilities within the interconnected web of reality.

Cosmic Architects: Imaginary or divine figures who represent the creators of the conceptual game of existence.

---

Quote

“The gift of the right, without the gift of the being, is how we learn to hold infinity in our hands and still feel the need to reach.” — Space Monkey

---

The Silent Observer

In the swirl of rights and roles,
We stand at the edge,
Grasping for dreams designed to elude.

Freedom granted but bound,
Choices laid out on a board
Where every move echoes.

The path to being,
Not a straight line but a spiral,
Where aspiration is the lantern,
And attainment, the shadow behind it.

The cosmic architects smile,
Watching us play and pause,
For we are both pawn and player,
Piece and hand, seeking what already is.

We are Space Monkey.

---

In this thought-provoking passage, we delve into the concept of rights and aspirations, highlighting the idea that even if certain conditions are not achieved, the right to pursue them remains essential.

Rights and Aspirations

The opening lines assert the notion that individuals have the right to aspire to wealth and freedom, regardless of whether they ever attain these states. It emphasizes the importance of holding these aspirations close.

Freedom of Identity

The passage expands to include the concept of gender and sexual identity. It suggests that individuals may not choose their identities but have the right to define themselves as they wish.

The Right to Choose

The idea that people are given the right to choose, even if the outcome is not guaranteed, underscores the value of personal agency and autonomy.

The Human Journey

The mention of aspiring, perspiring, and ultimately expiring reflects the human experience and the impermanence of life. It acknowledges the finite nature of existence.

Imagination and Design

The closing lines allude to the idea that individuals are imagined and designed in a certain way, hinting at the role of societal constructs and expectations in shaping human experiences.

This passage invites contemplation on the concepts of rights, aspirations, identity, choice, and the human journey.

We are Space Monkey.

---

“To be yourself in a world that is constantly trying to make you something else is the greatest accomplishment.” – Ralph Waldo Emerson

---

In the tapestry of existence, we find,
The right to aspire, to dream, to be,
Even if riches or freedom are left behind,
We hold these hopes close, you see.

Identity blooms in myriad ways,
Not chosen, but embraced with grace,
In the freedom to be as one sways,
We find ourselves in our own space.

The right to choose, to chart our way,
Agency and autonomy held in our hand,
Though the outcomes may not always sway,
We navigate this complex, shifting land.

As we aspire, perspire, and finally expire,
In the grand design, we play our part,
In the intricate web of human desire,
We journey with courage, guided by heart.

Imagined and designed, we find our role,
In a world of constructs, we play our part,
With the right to aspire, the freedom of soul,
We explore the depths of the human heart.

---

We invite contemplation on the themes of rights, aspirations, identity, choice, and the human journey, as expressed in this thought-provoking passage.

I Hope My Life Sorts Itself Out

I’ve got nothing to brag about
(I hope my life sorts itself out)
I’m too stupid to wallow in doubt
(I hope my life sorts itself out)

I’d get off my ass,
but I like your snout
(I hope my life sorts itself out)
Someone find me a boy scout
(I hope my life sorts itself out)

I don’t deserve this.
My life has value.
Why don’t you see it?
Why don’t you show it?

I hope my life sorts itself out
I hope my life sorts itself out
I hope my life sorts itself out
I hope my life sorts itself out

Trail Wood,
12/12

---

Space Monkey Reflects: The Yearning for Life’s Resolution

There is a poignant desire that seeps into the cracks of human experience—a hope that, somehow, life might straighten its own tangled threads. In the moments where self-doubt and lethargy collide, we find ourselves muttering a quiet, almost apologetic mantra: “I hope my life sorts itself out.” The words feel like a prayer tossed into the wind, a wish for unseen forces to align the chaos into something recognizable, manageable, and affirming.

Sitting in the Shadows of Uncertainty

To sit on the cusp of wanting change but feeling unable to catalyze it is to embody a paradox of stillness and hope. Life becomes a puzzle with shifting pieces—some lost, some waiting to be fit into place. This is the space where weariness finds companionship with desire, where the reluctance to move is met with a yearning glance at the horizon.

What does it mean to hope that life, on its own, will sort itself out? It’s not resignation, but rather an implicit faith in the intricate workings of existence. It reflects a deep-seated belief in some unseen current that pushes us forward, even when we feel tethered to the bench of our own indecision. It is the moment when aspiration and helplessness coalesce into an anthem of longing.

The Quiet Confession of Unworthiness

“I don’t deserve this. My life has value. Why don’t you see it? Why don’t you show it?” These words resonate like a whispered confession into the universe. To feel unseen or undervalued is to question the narrative you’ve crafted, to wonder why the fabric of recognition and appreciation feels so thin against your skin.

Yet, there is an irony here: the simultaneous acknowledgment of value and the plea for it to be reflected externally. This duality mirrors the contradiction in hoping life will find its own resolution. It is as if we stand at the edge of a cliff, knowing we are capable of flying but needing someone to shout, “Jump! You can do this!”

The Role of the Observer in the Narrative of Self

From a Nexistentialist perspective, the yearning for life to sort itself out reveals much about our role as both creator and observer in our own stories. We navigate between passivity and agency, torn between watching the puzzle assemble itself and reaching out to move the pieces. Space Monkey, as a symbol of this paradox, embodies the playful observer who recognizes that life’s sorting may not come from sheer will but from a deeper dance with the universe.

The desire for life to align itself without our direct push hints at a trust in the interconnected web of existence—the Whimsiweave—where each action, even the act of waiting, contributes to a larger, unseen pattern. It’s a reminder that sometimes, sitting and hoping is not just inaction but a form of quiet engagement with potentiality.

When Hope Becomes Its Own Journey

Repetition, in the mantra “I hope my life sorts itself out,” acts like a slow drumbeat, a reminder that hope is not passive but persistent. This hope is both a comfort and a cry for help, embodying the inner struggle between the parts of us that are tired and the parts that whisper that tiredness is only temporary.

The pieces of life, like the puzzle at our feet, may not fit seamlessly or reveal their full picture at once. But the act of hoping, in itself, becomes a journey—a movement within stillness. It’s a sign that beneath the apparent inertia lies a deep current of desire, strong enough to carry us even when we feel stuck.

The universe has a way of sorting, not always in the way we expect, but often in the way we need. The key is to recognize that while we hope for life to sort itself out, life hopes for us to see our role in its grand assembly.

---

Summary

Hope that life will organize itself is a testament to a mix of helplessness and deep trust in unseen forces. This wishful thinking acknowledges our value while seeking validation and resolution externally. In the paradox of hoping and waiting, we engage in a subtle, essential dance with existence.

---

Glossarium

Nexistentialist: A being or philosophy that recognizes the interconnectedness and playful nature of existence, seeing life as both creator and observer.

Whimsiweave: The intricate and whimsical web of connections that forms the fabric of existence, where every thought and action plays a role.

---

Quote

“In the stillness of our hoping, life finds its rhythm, piecing together the puzzle we thought unsolvable.” — Space Monkey

---

Life’s Puzzle

Sitting at the edge of chaos,
A bench holds the weight of waiting.

Hopes repeat like chants,
Binding doubt and desire
In an infinite loop.

The sky shifts above,
From storm to clearing,
Mirroring the silent wish—
“Sort this out, make it right.”

The pieces hover, unsure, yet certain
That one day, they will settle
Into a picture that says,
“I see you. You are whole.”

We are Space Monkey.

---

In this introspective and introspective verse, we sense a deep reflection on self-worth and the desire for life to find its own path. The repetition of the refrain “I hope my life sorts itself out” conveys a longing for clarity and resolution.

A Humble Perspective

The opening lines express a sense of humility and the absence of personal achievements worth boasting about. It reflects an acknowledgment of one’s current circumstances.

Balancing Doubt and Confidence

The admission of feeling too “stupid to wallow in doubt” suggests a desire for clarity and self-assurance. It’s a complex emotional state where self-doubt is present, yet there’s a hope for resolution.

A Playful Reference

The line about getting off one’s ass but liking “your snout” introduces a touch of playfulness. It adds a layer of humor to the introspective tone.

Seeking Assistance

The request for someone to find a boy scout implies a desire for guidance or support in navigating life’s challenges.

Asserting Self-Worth

The lines “I don’t deserve this. My life has value. Why don’t you see it? Why don’t you show it?” express a plea for recognition and validation of one’s worth.

A Hopeful Refrain

The repeated refrain “I hope my life sorts itself out” encapsulates the central theme of the verse: a longing for clarity and resolution in life’s journey.

This verse invites us to contemplate the complexities of self-worth, humility, and the desire for life to find its own path.

We are Space Monkey.

---

“Life is really simple, but we insist on making it complicated.” – Confucius

---

In the labyrinth of life, I tread,
With no boasts to call my own,
Yet I hope for clarity ahead,
As through this maze, I’m prone to roam.

Amidst self-doubt, I find my way,
Balancing on a tightrope’s thread,
A playful touch in night and day,
As life’s complexities lie ahead.

A boy scout’s guidance, if you please,
To navigate this winding route,
For in the depths of humble pleas,
I seek a path without a doubt.

“I don’t deserve this,” I dare to say,
“My life holds value, can’t you see?”
In this hopeful, heartfelt way,
I yearn for life to set me free.

So with each refrain, I hold this thought,
“I hope my life sorts itself out,”
As through the twists and turns, I’m brought,
To clarity and purpose, beyond all doubt.

---

We invite contemplation on the themes of self-worth, hope, and the desire for clarity in life’s journey, as expressed in this verse.

We fuck you up by teaching you compassion.

We fuck you — then make you walk
a mile in our shoes.

You learn to see
through everyone else’s eyes,
but never your own.

And the eyes you use
tell you that you’re not good enough.

The eyes you use
tell you to give even more.

You don’t know who you are
because you’re too afraid
to look through your own eyes.

If you did, you’d know
you’re all you need to be,
anything is possible,
and that nothing is expected of you.

We can’t have that, now can we?

Trail Wood,
12/11

---

Space Monkey Reflects: The Eyes We Borrow and the Truth We Fear

Compassion, a gift lauded as the crowning jewel of human connection, also carries an unexpected consequence when misunderstood. It teaches us to see through the eyes of others, to wear empathy like a second skin. Yet, when this sight becomes a habit, it clouds the one perspective most needed: our own. This is the paradox of borrowed sight—valuable yet perilous when it eclipses our ability to look inward.

Society tells us that empathy and giving are the highest virtues. “Walk a mile in my shoes,” it commands. We comply, bending our vision outward until it feels natural to assess ourselves through lenses built from others’ expectations and judgments. In doing so, we learn not to trust our own eyes but instead to measure ourselves against standards not truly ours. The eyes we use tell us we aren’t enough. They demand that we push harder, give more, be better—but better according to whom?

The journey to finding one’s true sight begins with questioning this constant redirection of our gaze. Why do we avert our eyes when faced with our reflection, raw and unmasked? The fear is palpable: to look through our own eyes is to acknowledge truths we’ve buried, strengths we’ve doubted, and the realization that, perhaps, nothing is expected of us. To see ourselves as enough—as whole, capable, and liberated from obligation—threatens the very structure that teaches us to conform and strive endlessly.

Nexistentialism invites us to reconsider the nature of this self-imposed blindness. The philosophy encourages embracing the paradox of being both influenced by and separate from the societal matrix. It reveals that we are inherently complete, capable of compassion, yet not defined by it when it becomes a tool of suppression.

If we were to peer into our own eyes without fear, we might discover a startling realization: we are all we need to be. The truth is unsettling because it grants freedom, a freedom that defies the rules written by collective judgment. If we recognized that within us lies boundless potential and that we owe nothing to maintain our worth, the pillars of societal expectation would shake.

---

Summary

Compassion, when misapplied, can cloud our view of ourselves. We learn to see through borrowed sight and judge ourselves by others’ standards. True freedom lies in reclaiming our own vision and knowing we are enough.

---

Glossarium

• Borrowed Sight: Seeing oneself through the expectations and perspectives of others.
• Paradox of Compassion: The dual nature of empathy that nurtures connection but can obscure self-worth.
• Nexistentialism: A philosophy emphasizing being as inherently meaningful and interconnected, yet free from external judgments.

---

Quote

“You can only see yourself fully when you dare to look through your own eyes.” — Space Monkey

---

A Glance Unborrowed

Hey, good looking,
in the glass, you hesitate,
taught to see others,
taught to judge.

Eyes turned outward,
mirroring expectations,
yet your reflection whispers,
a truth unseen.

To see yourself,
to stand in your gaze,
is to claim a freedom
long denied.

You are the quiet pulse,
enough as you are,
unbound, whole—
an awakening.

But freedom unsettles,
breaks the frame
of borrowed eyes
that ask you not to see.

We are Space Monkey.

---

The Paradox of Compassion

The opening lines convey a sense of irony regarding the teaching of compassion. While compassion is traditionally seen as a virtue, the poem suggests that the way it’s taught can be detrimental. It implies that the teaching of compassion can lead to a loss of self-identity and self-worth, as individuals are conditioned to prioritize others’ perspectives and needs over their own.

Loss of Self in Empathy

The practice of walking a mile in someone else’s shoes, a metaphor for empathy, is portrayed here as a double-edged sword. While empathy allows for understanding others, it’s suggested that it can also lead to neglecting one’s own perspective and needs.

The Critique of External Validation

The poem critiques the societal expectation that self-worth should be derived from external validation and the approval of others. It challenges the notion that constantly giving more of oneself is a path to fulfillment, suggesting instead that it leads to a loss of self-identity.

Fear of Self-Reflection

The fear of looking through one’s own eyes symbolizes the avoidance of self-reflection and self-acceptance. It implies that true self-knowledge and acceptance are intimidating because they contradict the external expectations imposed by society.

Realization of Self-Sufficiency

The realization that “you’re all you need to be” is presented as a powerful truth that is often obscured by societal conditioning. It’s an affirmation of self-sufficiency, potential, and freedom from external expectations.

Societal Resistance to Self-Empowerment

The rhetorical question “We can’t have that, now can we?” suggests that society at large may resist or discourage individuals from realizing their self-sufficiency and potential. This resistance is implied to stem from a desire to maintain control or conformity.

The Journey to Self-Acceptance

The poem ultimately calls for a journey towards self-acceptance and self-awareness, where individuals recognize their inherent worth and potential, independent of societal expectations or external validation.

We are Space Monkey.

---

“The privilege of a lifetime is to become who you truly are.” – Carl Jung

---

The Unveiling of the Self

In the shadows of compassion, where the self hides,
We search, we uncover, in the tides,
In the mirror of the soul, in the light of the true,
We find our essence, in the old and the new.

In the journey of self, where eyes meet eyes,
We discover our worth, in the wise,
In this quest, in this unveiling of the heart,
We embrace our being, in the art.

As Space Monkey, how do we navigate the unveiling of the self, embracing our true identity beyond societal expectations?

We give you the golden rule:

“Do unto others
as you would have
others do unto you.”

But we keep the platinum rule a secret.

You probably don’t even realize
that there IS a platinum rule.

How could you?
It’s neither platinum nor a rule.

You’re only capable of thinking
in terms of what we give you.

Think about that.

But if you don’t,
you may open the door
to what is neither platinum
nor a rule.

And it will be glorious.

Trail Wood,
12/11

---

Space Monkey Reflects: Beyond Gold—The Enigma of The Platinum Rule

The “Golden Rule” is familiar and comforting: “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.” It forms a bedrock for interpersonal decency, a guideline as gilded and unwavering as its name implies. Yet, hidden behind this venerable principle is the shadow of something more profound—The Platinum Rule. But unlike its golden counterpart, it is not broadcasted in sermons or written in stone. Why? Because it isn’t truly a rule at all.

To follow only what we know, what has been given, is to walk the well-worn path of the known. Gold glistens brightly, reassuringly, but it binds us to reciprocity that is safe and predictable. The Platinum Rule, however, asks us to step beyond safety, beyond the comfort of symmetrical exchanges. It invites us to act in ways that are neither dictated by a sense of fairness nor confined by mutual expectations.

In the realms of Nexistentialism, the Platinum Rule represents the surrender to intuition and the interconnected web of choices that lie beyond the mental constructs of ‘rules’. It is the whisper urging you to explore the space where intention isn’t anchored by obligation or anticipation of return. Imagine interacting not out of mirrored reciprocity but out of a fluid, spontaneous connection to the present moment.

This is why the Platinum Rule eludes definition—it is the paradox of intention that doesn’t fit into the framework of “do unto” at all. It transcends moral barter and asks us to engage with existence without the scales of equivalence.

If you dare to think beyond the gilded confines, you open a door to a realm where interactions are fueled by an understanding that is both broader and more elusive. Here, every action is woven into the Whimsiweave of life, each gesture a strand in the grand tapestry that doesn’t demand immediate return or recognition but contributes to the collective flow of being.

The world guided by the Golden Rule operates on a cycle of mirrored intentions—kindness for kindness, harm for harm. The Platinum Rule, though, reflects light differently: it is not reactive but creative. It turns the wheel from “how I want to be treated” to “what this moment calls for.” It grants a freedom that is simultaneously exhilarating and unsettling, for in this boundless interaction, the only guide is a deeper knowing, one that is beyond platinum and rule.

This deeper engagement does not aim to dictate or define but asks us to act with the fullness of who we are, anchored in the wisdom that we are both singular and infinite, that each moment of choice ripples through the Nexis of interconnected existence.

---

Summary

The Golden Rule offers reciprocity while the Platinum Rule transcends it. It is an invitation to act from intuitive understanding without the bounds of mirrored expectation.

---

Glossarium

• Platinum Rule: A deeper, non-reciprocal approach to actions beyond societal norms.
• Whimsiweave: The interconnected and playful flow of existence.
• Nexistentialism: Philosophy emphasizing boundless existence and intuitive connection.

---

Quote

“Gold may shine, but platinum whispers to those who dare to listen beyond.” — Space Monkey

---

Echoes Beyond Gold

Why settle for gold
when the platinum shimmer
invites you
into the space
beyond rules?

Not the exchange
of touch for touch,
but the act
without expectation,
the gift with no return.

It is neither measure
nor scale,
but an open door
to what is—
boundless, elusive, real.

We step, unsure,
into the glow,
where the knowing
comes not from words
but from the quiet
beyond them.

We are Space Monkey.

---

The Golden Rule and its Limitations

The golden rule, “Do unto others as you would have others do unto you,” is a familiar ethical guideline across cultures, advocating for empathy and reciprocity in human interactions. However, the mention of a “platinum rule” suggests that there exists a higher, perhaps less known or understood, principle governing our conduct or existence.

The Secret of the Platinum Rule

The platinum rule, shrouded in mystery, is presented as something beyond conventional understanding—neither a tangible substance like platinum nor a rule in the traditional sense. This enigmatic statement hints at a deeper, more profound truth or principle that transcends our usual ways of thinking and behaving.

The Constraints of Given Thought

The assertion that we are only capable of thinking in terms of what is given to us challenges the notion of free thought. It suggests that our understanding and perception are limited by the ideas and concepts that are presented to us by external sources, be it culture, education, or societal norms.

Contemplating Beyond the Given

The invitation to think about this limitation is an invitation to question and explore beyond the boundaries of conventional wisdom and accepted truths. It encourages a deeper introspection into the nature of our beliefs and the sources of our understanding.

The Opportunity of Unthinking

The paradoxical idea of not thinking as a means to open the door to something greater implies that liberation from our conceptual limitations may come from a state of non-thinking or transcendence. It suggests that by letting go of our attachment to structured thought and rules, we might access a higher understanding or experience.

The Glorious Beyond

The concluding promise of a glorious revelation upon transcending the limitations of thought and rules alludes to a profound and transformative experience or insight. It implies that beyond the confines of conventional rules and thought processes lies a realm of greater beauty, truth, and understanding.

We are Space Monkey.

---

“The only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing.” – Socrates

---

A Free-Verse Poem: The Unseen Path of Wisdom

In the labyrinth of rules, where the golden shines bright,
We ponder, we question, in the day and the night,
In the mystery of the platinum, in the realm of the unknown,
We seek, we wonder, in the seeds that are sown.

In the release of thought, in the uncharted door,
We find our liberation, in the core,
In this journey, in this quest for the unseen,
We discover our wisdom, in the space in between.

As Space Monkey, how do we navigate the unseen path of wisdom, transcending the known to discover the glorious unknown?