Deeply Shallow
As shallow as I think I am,
I can be infinitely shallower.
As deep as I think I am,
I can be infinitely deeper.
I am what I think I am.
But I can be anything more
or anything less.
11/30
Space Monkey Reflects: The Paradox of Being Deeply Shallow
To be deeply shallow is to dwell in the paradox of self-perception, to acknowledge that the self can be both profound and surface-level, both complex and simple. In one moment, we swim in depths that feel boundless, layered with meaning and mystery; in the next, we find ourselves wading in the shallows, barely scratching the surface of understanding. This balance between the deep and the shallow reminds us that identity is not a fixed state but an ever-shifting spectrum of possibility.
When we declare ourselves “shallow,” we imply that our thoughts and actions lack complexity, as if our essence hovers just above the surface. But to be “deeply shallow” suggests a playful acceptance of the times when we are lighter, more superficial, or less engaged in introspection. It’s a reminder that depth is not a constant requirement and that sometimes, simplicity can offer clarity where complexity confounds. To dwell in the shallow end of life does not negate our capacity for depth; it merely honors the range of our experience.
On the other side, our capacity for depth is limitless. To be “infinitely deep” is to explore beyond ordinary understanding, to dive into layers of the self that reach into the unknown. When we allow ourselves to go deeper, we encounter facets of identity and perception that are richer, more nuanced, and often surprising. These moments of depth invite us to embrace the parts of ourselves that resonate with the vastness of existence, the ONEness, the interconnectedness that we sense beneath the surface.
In Nexistentialism, being both shallow and deep is a reflection of the fluid nature of the self, an acknowledgment that we are multidimensional beings capable of embodying a vast array of perspectives. Within the Nexis, the interconnected web of existence, every layer of self—whether shallow or profound—holds meaning. Our capacity to experience both ends of this spectrum without judgment is a testament to our adaptability and the richness of the human experience. It allows us to be, simultaneously, lighthearted and introspective, playful and contemplative.
This fluidity invites a freeing perspective: that we do not have to choose between depth and shallowness but can inhabit both. When we approach life without a fixed notion of what we “should” be, we open ourselves to the entire range of being. We become adaptable, recognizing that there is value in both depth and simplicity, in both deep contemplation and shallow enjoyment. We are not bound to one mode of being but are free to flow between them as the moment invites.
The self, then, becomes a dance between these polarities, a space where we are both “deeply shallow” and “shallowly deep.” We exist in this paradox, a blend of contrasting aspects that create a fuller, richer sense of identity. Our experiences are not diminished by being either shallow or deep; rather, they are enhanced by our willingness to embrace the full spectrum. Each shallow moment provides a reprieve, a chance to breathe lightly; each deep moment offers insight, a plunge into the mystery.
This embrace of paradox is liberating. We see that we are not bound by a single identity, that we can move effortlessly between the layers of self without losing who we are. Whether we skim the surface or dive into the depths, we remain connected to the ONEness, to the web of existence that holds both lightness and profundity. The dance between the deep and the shallow becomes an art form, a way of living that honors the entirety of our being.
So, as deeply shallow as we might feel, there is always room to go deeper. As infinitely deep as we think we are, there is a beauty in remaining at the surface, enjoying the simplicity of the moment. In this paradox, we find a wholeness that celebrates both the depth and the shallowness of the self, an acknowledgment that we are vast enough to contain both and everything in between.
Summary
Being “deeply shallow” reflects the paradox of self-perception, where the self can be both profound and surface-level. This perspective embraces the fluidity of identity, celebrating both the lightness of simplicity and the richness of depth.
Glossarium
Deeply Shallow: A playful term for the paradox of experiencing oneself as both profound and surface-level, embracing the full spectrum of identity.
Nexistential: A perspective within Nexistentialism that sees identity as fluid, capable of encompassing both depth and simplicity.
ONEness: The fundamental unity of existence, containing all levels of experience, from shallow to deep.
Quote
“To be deeply shallow is to dance between lightness and depth, honoring the full spectrum of self without the need for judgment.” — Space Monkey
In the Depth of Shallows
I wade in shallows, light and free
but feel the pull of depths below
In layers unseen, both light and shade
a dance of self, a fluid flow
For as shallow as I seem to be
there’s a deeper me that lies beneath
each step a choice, each breath a blend
of light, of depth, of shadowed sheath
I am both vast and simple here
a paradox both deep and clear
embracing all, yet holding none
the self a song forever spun
We are Space Monkey
We embark on a contemplative journey through the paradoxical depths of self-perception, exploring the fluidity of our identity and the boundless potential for both shallowness and depth within us.
The Paradox of Shallow Depths
The notion of being ‘infinitely shallower’ than one perceives themselves to be introduces a fascinating paradox. It suggests that our understanding of our own superficiality can always extend further, hinting at layers of simplicity or lack of depth that we may not even be aware of.
The Abyss of Inner Depth
Conversely, the idea of being ‘infinitely deeper’ reflects the limitless potential for complexity and profundity within us. It implies that no matter how deep we believe ourselves to be, there are always further depths to explore, more layers of our being to uncover.
The Fluidity of Self-Perception
The phrase ‘I am what I think I am’ encapsulates the fluid nature of identity. Our self-perception shapes our reality, but it is not fixed. It evolves with our thoughts, experiences, and insights, constantly reshaping who we are.
The Spectrum of Potential
This reflection opens up the spectrum of potential within each of us. We can be ‘anything more or anything less,’ suggesting that our identity is not a static entity but a dynamic continuum. We have the capacity to expand or contract our sense of self, to explore the realms of both shallowness and depth.
The Choice of Self-Expansion or Contraction
The poem subtly hints at the choice inherent in our existence. We can choose to explore the depths of our character, to expand our understanding and experience of the world. Alternatively, we can contract, embracing simplicity and surface-level existence.
“The deeper I go into myself the more I realize that I am my own enemy.” – Floriano Martins
A Canvas of Self
In the gallery of being,
We paint our portraits,
Shades of shallow and deep,
In strokes of thought and perception.
Each layer, a choice,
To delve deeper or skim the surface,
In this dance of identity,
We are the artists and the art.
Infinitely shallow, infinitely deep,
The canvas stretches wide,
In the spectrum of self,
Lies the freedom to explore.
So let us wield our brushes,
In bold strokes of introspection,
For in the depths of our being,
Lies the masterpiece of existence.
We are Space Monkey.
We invite reflections on the fluid nature of our identity and the endless potential for both depth and shallowness within us.
Leave a Reply