![](https://capeodd.com/wp-content/uploads/do-you-agree-scaled.jpg)
Seems we’re fighting
for what is ours.
Seems we’re fighting
for what SHOULD be ours.
Seems we’re fighting
for what is right.
Seems we’re fighting
for what SHOULD be right.
Seems we’re fighting
for what is true.
Seems we’re fighting
for what SHOULD be true.
In other words,
we’re in perfect agreement.
We simply
see things differently.
Seems we’re fighting
for agreement.
Seems we’re fighting
for what SHOULD be agreement.
Trail Wood,
11/1
Space Monkey Reflects: Fighting for Agreement
It’s a curious thing, isn’t it? So much of human conflict arises from the desire for agreement—for alignment and validation when others see the world as we do. We fight for what we believe is ours, for what we think should be ours. We fight for what we consider right, and for what we believe should be right. We fight for what we hold to be true, and for what we think should be true. And yet, beneath all of this, there lies an irony—we’re already in perfect agreement on one fundamental point.
![](https://capeodd.com/wp-content/uploads/DALL·E-2023-11-01-08.28.43-Escher-style-woodcut-with-intertwined-individuals-engaged-in-what-appears-to-be-a-struggle-or-disagreement.-However-as-the-patterns-continue-it-beco.png)
What’s the agreement? It’s not about the specifics of our beliefs or truths, or even what we claim as our rights. No, the agreement is deeper, simpler. The agreement is that we all believe we are fighting for something that matters. We agree that what we stand for is worth defending. The disagreement lies not in the importance of the fight, but in the interpretation of the issue itself.
In a way, we are all fighting for the same thing—meaning. Whether it’s through truth, rights, justice, or even the desire for validation, we are all striving to assert what matters to us, and that common struggle unites us in a way we often fail to recognize. The tension arises because each of us defines these concepts differently. The idea of “what’s true” or “what’s right” skews in varied directions based on our individual perspectives, but the fight itself comes from a shared impulse.
So, are we really fighting for truth or for agreement? Perhaps, at the core, we’re fighting for the recognition that our version of truth holds meaning, that our experiences and beliefs deserve space. The real paradox is that while we pull at different ends of the same metaphorical scroll, we overlook the fact that we are both holding onto it. The struggle for agreement—be it about truth, rights, or anything else—springs from this unspoken, shared agreement that these fights matter deeply to us all.
In the end, we are not so divided after all.
Summary
Human conflict often stems from the desire for agreement and validation. While we may fight for different truths or rights, the common ground lies in our shared belief that these struggles matter.
Glossarium
Agreement Pull: The struggle between individuals or groups who fight over their interpretations of truth and rights, while unknowingly agreeing that the fight itself is meaningful.
Quote
“We’re not fighting because we’re different. We’re fighting because we care about the same thing.” — Space Monkey
The Shared Scroll
Two hands pull,
Both grip the same scroll,
One fights for truth,
One fights for right.
They pull,
And the tension grows,
But neither lets go,
For both know—
They’re holding the same scroll.
We are Space Monkey.
The Illusion of Disagreement
In our poetic composition, “Do you agree?”, we touch upon a deeply intriguing paradox of human interaction and consciousness. It appears as if we’re engaged in a struggle, wrestling with differing ideas and viewpoints. We’re fighting for what we believe is ours, what should be ours; for what is right, what should be right; for what is true, what should be true. Yet, within these battles lies a nuanced revelation: the illusion of disagreement.
Multiple Facets of a Singular Truth
When we scrutinize the nature of our so-called fights or disagreements, we discover that we’re essentially navigating multiple facets of a singular truth. These facets reflect our individual experiences, backgrounds, and perceptions. So, are we truly in conflict? Or are we merely different expressions of the same underlying reality, seemingly at odds due to our limited perspectives?
The Dance of Perspective
This apparent dissonance is akin to a dance, a cosmic twirl of perspectives seeking harmony even in discord. We may believe that we are striving for different outcomes, yet we often yearn for the same essence—be it justice, love, freedom, or truth. The variations in our approaches to these universal yearnings serve to enrich the collective experience rather than diminish it.
Perfect Agreement in Disagreement
The closing lines of our composition capture this sentiment aptly: “Seems we’re fighting for agreement. Seems we’re fighting for what SHOULD be agreement.” Here lies the profound irony. Even when we seem to be in disagreement, we are, in essence, striving for a state of accord. Our fights are, paradoxically, a search for unity, albeit expressed through diverse lenses.
We are Space Monkey.
We don’t see things as they are; we see them as we are.
— Anaïs Nin
Verses of Agreement
In the depths of seeming conflict
A silent understanding blooms
Each voice, a unique melody
Together, composing an unheard tune
We fight, yet we harmonize
In this complex cosmic waltz
Each step a move toward union
Each turn, a shared somersault
For in our disagreements
In our clamor and our strife
We discover hidden symphonies
The nuanced music of life
In the end, it’s not about winning
Or whose viewpoint will prevail
It’s about the majestic whirling
In this grand, divine fairytale
We invite you to share your insights.
Leave a Reply