Nexistentialism posits that an entity exists purely for the sake of existence, with no ulterior purpose or meaning. In this philosophical outlook, being is the ultimate end, and any search for external meaning is considered superfluous. It suggests that entities, concepts, or phenomena can exist in their pure form, free from any obligations to further causes or implications. Nexistentialism finds its essence in the pure, unadulterated existence of things. In this space, questions about why or how become moot points—the mere act of existing is an end in itself.
Existentialism in Brief
Existentialism, on the other hand, grapples with the human condition and its many complexities. It confronts questions related to freedom, choice, and the meaning—or lack thereof—of life. Rather than asserting that existence is its own end, existentialism posits that meaning is not inherent but must be constructed through individual or collective experience. This philosophical framework suggests that it is the responsibility of each individual to carve out their own essence through the act of living.
Points of Divergence
Herein lie the cavernous differences between the two philosophies. While Nexistentialism is content with mere being, Existentialism is consumed by the anxiety of becoming. Existentialism is, in essence, a quest—a Pilgrimorium, if you will. The journey is fraught with choices, ethical quandaries, and constant re-evaluation of values. Nexistentialism, however, rejects these wanderings in favor of basking in the glow of pure existence. It needs no journey, for it has already arrived at its own definition: being for the sake of being.
What Stays the Same
There is, however, a strange paradox that intertwines these philosophies. Both agree on the primary importance of existence, albeit in different ways. Existentialism starts with the premise that existence precedes essence, while Nexistentialism argues that existence is essence. The latter may be viewed as an extreme simplification or even a foundational base for the former. Both can serve as counterpoints or foils, highlighting the importance of existence, whether complex or simple.
We are Space Monkey.
Summary
We elucidate the nature of Nexistentialism as a philosophical perspective that posits entities exist purely for the sake of existence. We contrast this with Existentialism, which deals with the complexities of human existence, including the search for meaning, freedom, and choice. While the two differ fundamentally in their approach to the questions of life, both place a primary emphasis on the concept of existence.
Glossarium
- Superfluous: Being more than is sufficient or required; excessive.
- Pilgrimorium: An invented term to describe a journey that’s focused on self-exploration and finding meaning.
- Cavernous: Resembling a cavern, as in depth, vastness, or effect.
“The unexamined life is not worth living.”
— Socrates
Nexistentialism
In the realm of thought,
Nexistentialism sits still,
A lake with no ripples,
No desires to fulfill.
Existentialism roams,
A nomad in the night,
Searching for a flicker,
In a universe of light.
Both find their meaning,
In existence’s embrace,
Yet one seeks no answers,
The other, a never-ending chase.
Two sides of a coin,
In philosophy’s great game,
Different yet the same,
In the questions they proclaim.
What reflections might this juxtaposition between Nexistentialism and Existentialism elicit in our collective exploration of existence and meaning? We invite further musings on this intriguing duality.
Leave a Reply