Truth?
“Is it right to offer words of support that you don’t absolutely know as truth?“
We’ve all done this. Maybe. Someone is depressed, so you say “things will get better.” Someone is dying in the hospital and you say “you can handle this.” All the while it seems clear to self that things WON’T get better and your special someone probably CAN’T handle it.
That means a lot of the time you’re lying. Maybe someone dies. It happens.
Or are you telling the truth?
I suppose from a metaphysical perspective, things DID get better, for living is perhaps the lowest metaphysical state. (Not that Divine You wants to judge.) Passing on seems to present all sorts of positive opportunities.
But you don’t exactly tell someone “well if you die, good for you” now do you? Or you don’t say “well your life is going to seem EVEN WORSE for a while, but all experience is good when seen from a Divine Perspective.”
So you offer words of encouragement. Lies, perhaps from their perspective, but not from yours.
Still, we don’t absolutely know, now do we?
Maybe feeding people make believe is the best way to create truth. Maybe your suggestion that things will get better is enough to flip the belief switch, which flips the reality switch.
At the human level, sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn’t. At the soul level, it ALWAYS works. We just don’t know that it works.
Now ANY make believe has the same positive potential. It seems to lead to an experience that is appreciated by the soul. Not necessarily by the human, but by the soul.
Interesting.
So is it “right” to offer words of support that you don’t absolutely know as truth?
Sure, why not.
What say you?
8/22
Space Monkey Reflects: The Nature of Truth and Support
In moments of uncertainty and hardship, offering words of support can feel like walking a tightrope between honesty and compassion. The poem “Truth?” invites us to explore the complexities of providing encouragement, particularly when we don’t absolutely know the outcome. This reflection delves into the balance between human empathy and metaphysical understanding, questioning whether it’s right to offer support that may not be entirely truthful from one perspective but holds potential truth from another.
“Is it right to offer words of support that you don’t absolutely know as truth?” This opening question sets the stage for a profound exploration of truth, belief, and the impact of our words. It challenges us to consider the ethics of providing comfort when certainty is elusive.
We’ve all done this. Maybe. Someone is depressed, so you say “things will get better.” Someone is dying in the hospital and you say “you can handle this.” All the while it seems clear to self that things WON’T get better and your special someone probably CAN’T handle it. These lines capture the internal conflict we often face when offering support. The tension between wanting to provide hope and the fear of being dishonest is palpable.
That means a lot of the time you’re lying. Maybe someone dies. It happens. Or are you telling the truth? This reflection highlights the ambiguity inherent in such situations. It questions whether offering hope, even when the outcome seems bleak, is inherently deceitful or if it holds a deeper, perhaps metaphysical truth.
I suppose from a metaphysical perspective, things DID get better, for living is perhaps the lowest metaphysical state. (Not that Divine You wants to judge.) Passing on seems to present all sorts of positive opportunities. This perspective introduces the idea that death and suffering might be viewed differently from a higher, metaphysical standpoint. It suggests that what we perceive as negative may hold positive potential beyond our immediate understanding.
But you don’t exactly tell someone “well if you die, good for you” now do you? Or you don’t say “well your life is going to seem EVEN WORSE for a while, but all experience is good when seen from a Divine Perspective.” These lines acknowledge the practical and ethical limitations of sharing such perspectives with those in distress. They emphasize the need for compassion and sensitivity in our interactions.
So you offer words of encouragement. Lies, perhaps from their perspective, but not from yours. Still, we don’t absolutely know, now do we? This reflection suggests that offering support, even if it feels like a lie, might hold a deeper truth that we cannot fully comprehend. It emphasizes the uncertainty that permeates our understanding of truth.
Maybe feeding people make believe is the best way to create truth. Maybe your suggestion that things will get better is enough to flip the belief switch, which flips the reality switch. At the human level, sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn’t. At the soul level, it ALWAYS works. We just don’t know that it works. This insight proposes that belief and intention can shape reality. Encouragement might serve as a catalyst for positive change, both on a practical and a metaphysical level.
Now ANY make believe has the same positive potential. It seems to lead to an experience that is appreciated by the soul. Not necessarily by the human, but by the soul. Interesting. This idea extends the potential impact of positive thinking and encouragement, suggesting that even if outcomes are not immediately visible, they contribute to the soul’s growth and appreciation of experiences.
So is it “right” to offer words of support that you don’t absolutely know as truth? Sure, why not. What say you? This concluding question and affirmation invite us to embrace the uncertainty and potential power of our words. It encourages us to offer support with the understanding that, while we may not know the outcome, our intentions hold transformative potential.
The contemplative scene of a person sitting thoughtfully by a window, gazing out at a tranquil landscape, captures the essence of this reflection. The elements of an open book, a cup of tea, and a gentle breeze symbolize contemplation and support. The serene atmosphere emphasizes the balance between human uncertainty and metaphysical understanding, mirroring the poem’s exploration of truth and encouragement.
In conclusion, “Truth?” invites us to reflect on the complexities of offering support in uncertain times. It challenges us to consider the power of belief and the potential impact of our words, even when certainty is elusive. By embracing the ambiguity and potential of our encouragement, we can navigate the delicate balance between honesty and compassion, contributing to a deeper, more nuanced understanding of truth and support.
Summary
“Truth?” explores the ethics of offering support in uncertainty. It suggests belief and intention can shape reality, balancing human empathy with metaphysical understanding.
Glossarium
Metaphysical Perspective: Viewing experiences beyond the physical realm, considering higher, often spiritual, meanings.
Belief Switch: The idea that believing in positive outcomes can help manifest those outcomes in reality.
Quote
“Maybe feeding people make believe is the best way to create truth.” — Space Monkey
Reflections of Support
In moments of doubt
We offer words
Balancing truth and hope
Shaping reality with belief
Navigating the delicate line
Between honesty and compassion
We are Space Monkey
Leave a Reply