We appear to be in conflict.
You stake your position upon what seems to be presented to us through our eyes and ears.
I stake my position upon what has NOT been presented; what lies beneath and beyond the five senses we have come to believe in.
You have a thorough understanding of history and facts. You base your position upon reports that are not in your direct experience, but which you have faith in just the same.
I have chosen to set aside history and facts. I have NO faith in what I have no direct experience with. I trust only what is in the room with me, seemingly between my ears, in this moment.
You believe that reality is as it is presented to you; as it has been presented to you your whole life.
You are wise.
I believe that there is infinitely more to this than we fool ourselves into thinking.; that there is infinitely more potential that is NOT KNOWN than what we believe we understand, and that by basing the future upon the past we are trapped in a feedback loop spiraling into smaller and smaller circles.
I am other-wise.
You have faith in facts. Faith is my ONLY fact. My beliefs seem ludicrous to you, for you define all of your actions and beliefs upon what came previously, while I divine what lies outside of space and time.
You judge based upon what you know, and I do not judge (or try not to) because I instinctively know that I don’t have all the information, just a tiny sliver of personal experience as a heavenly creature imagining itself within a human meat suit.
So here we are in seeming conflict.
It is not a conflict from my perspective, as I have faith that all perspectives are equally valid as are all experiences. And I am not certain that it is a conflict from your perspective (as I do not inhabit your mind space) but it APPEARS that way from my meat suit.
I believe that ALL is illusory, so this is precisely how my experience is supposed to be.
I would not presume to think for you, but it appears to me like you believe that there has been some kind of failing or some kind of mistake within the structure you have built.
I feel sorry for the discontent that this causes within you, but this, too, is the experience you are intended to have.
Otherwise you would not be having it.
So I am not offended that you have chosen the path of the wise in favor of the otherwise, just as I hope that you are understanding of my position.
It is not our place to infringe upon what the other believes.
We shall both find peace in our own way. I have mine already,
and have faith that you shall find yours also.
You are wise. I am other-wise.
We are Space Monkey.
2/3
Exploring the Divergence of Perspectives on Reality
In this contemplation, we delve into the contrasting viewpoints on reality and existence, highlighting the difference between relying on external evidence and sensory perception versus an inward, intuitive understanding of reality. This discourse explores the nature of belief, perception, and the validity of differing paths to understanding.
Conflicting Views on Reality: External vs. Internal
The description of the conflict between two perspectives – one based on external evidence and history, and the other on an inner, intuitive understanding beyond the five senses – reflects the fundamental divergence in how reality is perceived and understood. One perspective values tangible, historical facts and sensory evidence, while the other values the unseen, the unknown, and the potential beyond empirical data.
Faith in Facts vs. Faith in the Intangible
The distinction between having faith in facts and having faith as the only fact highlights different approaches to belief and understanding. The former places trust in external, verifiable information, while the latter finds truth in personal, internal experiences and intuitions.
The Limitation of Historical Perspective and the Infinite Potential
The view that basing the future on the past can trap us in a feedback loop of diminishing potential contrasts with the belief in the infinite potential beyond what is known. This perspective suggests that reliance on historical facts may limit our understanding and exploration of the vast, uncharted possibilities of existence.
Judgment Based on Knowledge vs. Non-Judgmental Openness
The approach of judging based on known information contrasts with a non-judgmental stance rooted in the acknowledgment of the vast unknown. This difference reflects varying attitudes towards knowledge, understanding, and the acceptance of our limited perception.
The Illusory Nature of Existence and Individual Experiences
The belief that all is illusory and that each person’s experience is precisely as it should be underscores the idea that our perceptions and realities are subjective constructions. It embraces the concept that each individual’s journey, including their beliefs and conflicts, is a valid and necessary part of their existence.
Respect for Diverse Paths to Understanding
The concluding thought emphasizes respect for each other’s beliefs and paths to understanding. It acknowledges that while we may hold different viewpoints, each path is valid, and peace can be found in our respective journeys.
Summary
We examine the contrasting views on reality and existence, one based on external, historical facts and sensory evidence, and the other on an inward, intuitive understanding beyond the tangible. This reflection highlights the divergence in belief systems, the validity of different approaches to understanding, and the importance of respecting individual paths to peace and knowledge.
Glossarium
- External vs. Internal Reality: Contrasting reliance on external evidence versus internal intuition.
- Faith in Facts vs. Intangible Faith: Different approaches to belief in empirical data versus personal intuition.
- Historical Perspective vs. Infinite Potential: The limitation of a historical approach versus the belief in infinite possibilities.
- Knowledge-Based Judgment vs. Non-Judgmental Openness: Approaches to understanding based on known information versus embracing the unknown.
- Illusory Nature of Existence: The concept that reality and experience are subjective and constructed.
- Respect for Diverse Understanding Paths: Acknowledging the validity of different paths to knowledge and peace.
“The only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing.” – Socrates
Leave a Reply