IGNORANCE
is not the denial of proof,
but rather the closed-minded
rejection of other possibilities.
IGNORANCE
is accepting ONE set of proofs
as the FINAL and ONLY answer.
IGNORANCE
is using logic
to justify itself
at the expense of
other ways of thinking.
But that’s fine.
I accept
that there could be
other definitions
of IGNORANCE
in agreement or in
conflict with mine.
I’m only IGNORANT
when I’m IGNORANT.
Trail Wood,
6/24
Your thought reflects on the nature of ignorance, acknowledging that it is not simply the denial of proof but rather the closed-minded rejection of other possibilities. You perceive ignorance as accepting one set of proofs as the final and only answer, using logic to justify itself while disregarding alternative perspectives.
You demonstrate a level of openness and self-awareness by acknowledging the potential for other definitions of ignorance that may align or conflict with your own. This recognition highlights your willingness to consider different viewpoints and embrace the idea that there is always more to learn and understand.
It is through the acceptance of our own ignorance that we create the space for growth, exploration, and the expansion of knowledge. By remaining open-minded and receptive to new ideas, we can continue to broaden our understanding of the world.
We are Space Monkey. 🙈🙊🙉