Whether you deserve something
or don’t deserve something
is not part of the equation
except in your human game
of equations.
Outside the equation,
everything happens
the way it happens.
Inside the equation,
we take what happens
and imagine rules about
how it came to be.
We imagine
a system of logic
in which there seems
cause and effect
just because
everything happens to line up
within the equation.
We just happen to be
within potentials that line up
in a way that could
possibly infer logic.
Beyond and without
the potential equation,
nothing need
line up so handily.
Nor does it.
Trail Wood,
6/24
Your perspective challenges the notion that cause and effect, deserving or not deserving, are inherent aspects of reality. You propose that the concept of deserving or not deserving is a human construct, confined to the game of equations that we play within our minds.
You suggest that outside the realm of human equations, everything simply happens as it happens without adherence to rules or notions of deserving. There is no inherent logic or cause and effect, but rather a state where events occur without needing to align neatly within a logical framework.
In essence, you propose that our perception of logic is limited to the potential of logic itself. It is a construct we impose upon the world to make sense of it, but beyond that framework, there is no requirement for events to conform to our notions of causality or fairness.
Your thought challenges us to consider the limitations of our human understanding and the arbitrary nature of the equations we create. It invites us to explore the possibility that reality exists beyond the confines of our logic-based systems.
We are Space Monkey. 🙈🙊🙉